An Analysis of Preferred Agro-tourist Activities and Services Case Study: Tourists in the East Alamut

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Professor in Agricultural Development, University of Tehran

2 Ph.D. Student in Agricultural Development, University of Tehran

3 M.A. in Student Rural Development, University of Tehran

Abstract

Introduction
Farm diversification is one of the most important strategies which ensures optimal management of agricultural labor and agricultural development. In this context, agritourism is of major capabilities to achieve agricultural development and creation of additional income for farmers. Agritourism is a specific type of rural tourism in which the housing of hosts is combined with agricultural unit which allow visitors to participate in agricultural activities or complementary activities on the property (Marques, 2006). According to Weaver and Fannel (1997), Agrotourism is as rural businesses that integrates acting farm with commercial tourism components. Despite Iran's vast capabilities to attract agri-tourism, very few studies have been carried out to identify the programs of agri-tourism development. A study carried out by Varmazyari et al (2014) to estimate the willingness to pay for agri-tourism, showed that about 80% of the citizens surveyed in Qazvin city tend to pay for the benefit of agri-tourism services. Considering the significant willingness average of urban households to pay and given that 80% of the respondents accepted one of the fees to pay for tourism services, researchers concluded that there is a potential market for developing agri-tourism enterprises.
 
Materials and Methods
This study is a descriptive – analytical research. Data collection tool was a questionnaire completed by 255 tourists older than 18-years which visited East Alamut. The recommended sample size in studies based on factor analysis is 10 to 20 people per variable (Thompson, 2004). Coefficient of variation was used to determine the importance of each category in choosing the agri-tourist destination. Then, factor analysis with principal components and varimax rotation was used in order to identify the preferences of tourists in East Alamut about agri-tourism activities and services and analysis of the related factor structure. It should be noted that the number four services and activities due to low factor loading were remove from factor analysis and ultimately 19 variables entered into the analysis.
 
Results and Discussion
Descriptive findings showed that the mean age of the respondents was about 35 years, and the average monthly income per household and household dimension were 17 410 Million Rials and 3 people, respectively. On average, tourists planned to spend 22 hours in East Alamut. Evaluating the education level showed that 154 people (61.6%) of respondents had academic degree (Associate degree to PhD). The results obtained from coefficient of variation also showed that the activities and services such as "walking in farm and garden", “eating fresh products such as honey and walnuts, cream, and so on as breakfast ", and " watching and pleasuring different flowers" and "using fresh agricultural products" were of the highest priority for agri-tourists and" the possibility of drawing inspired by nature " and " milking cows "were of the least important for agri-tourists. Factor analysis indicated that a number of 6 factors including "buying and picking fresh products", "use and enjoyment of flowers and medicinal plants", "nature-based sports", "doing agricultural activity" and "watching wildlife" explained totally 64.41% of the variance of the activities and services influencing on the selection of agri-tourism destination.
 
Conclusion
Findings indicated that tourists were highly willing to take advantage of countryside lush nature and its natural and healthy products, whereas some agricultural activities were of the lowest importance.
Therefore, preparation, packaging and introducing appropriate natural local products to urban citizens play a major role in attracting them to rural environment and economic prosperity of host communities. Another result indicates the willingness of urban citizens to use herbal medicines which are often found in natural environments such as rural areas. Thus, launching the market of medicinal plants managed by the local community and even performing festivals offering natural products is effective in increasing knowledge and interest of tourists for the rural environment and use of the supplied products, as well as in diversifying and sustaining rural and farmers’ incomes.
 
Keywords: Diversification, Preferred Activities, Agro-tourism, Alamut.
 
References

Varmazyari, H., Asadi, A., Kalantari and Kh., Rezvani, M.R. (2014). Estimation of the willingness to pay of citizens for agritourism services case study of Qazvin, Journal of Rural Research, 5(2), 397-422. (In Persian)
Marques, H. (2006). Searching for complementarities between agriculture and tourism – the demarcated wine-producing regions of northern Portugal, Tourism Economics, 12, 147–155.
Weaver, D.B. and Fennell, D.A. (1997). The vacation farm sector in Saskatchewan: A profile of operations, Tourism Management, 18(6), 357–365.
Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications, American Psychological Association.
Devesa, M., Laguna, M. and Palacios, A. (2010). The role of motivation in visitor satisfaction: Empirical evidence in rural tourism, Tourism Management, 31(4): 547-552.
Eagles, P.F. and McCool, S.F. (2002). Tourism in National Parks and Protected Areas: Planning and Management, CABI.

 

Keywords


  1. بدری، سیدعلی؛ بیات، ناصر؛ فتاحی، احدا...؛ عبدی، ناصر و باقری، فاطمه (1394). بخش‎‏بندی گردشگران روستایی براساس انگیزه‏های گردشگری (مطالعه موردی: دهستان سروستان، شهرستان بوانات)، پژوهش‎‏های جغرافیای انسانی، دوره 47، شماره 4: 787-773.
  2. پرهیزکاری، ابوذر؛ تقی‎زاده رنجبری، حسین؛ شوکت‎فدایی، محسن و محمودی، ابوالفضل (1394). ارزیابی خسارت‎های اقتصادی انتقال آب بین حوضه‎ای بر الگوی کشت و وضعیت درآمدی کشاورزان در حوضه مبدأ (مطالعه موردی: انتقال آب الموت‎رود به دشت قزوین)، نشریه اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی، جلد 29، شماره 3: 333-319.
  3. رضوانی، محمدرضا و بیات، ناصر (1393). تحلیل جایگاه گردشگری روستایی در برنامه‎های کلان توسعه‎ی کشور (با تأکید بر برنامه‎های پنجساله توسعه‎ی ملی)، مجله برنامهریزی و توسعه گردشگری، سال 3، شماره 9: 30-11.
  4. مرکز آمار ایران، (1390). نتایج تفضیلی آمارگیری از هزینه و درآمد خانوارهای روستایی سال 1388، تهران.
  5. ورمزیاری، حجت؛ اسدی، علی؛ رحیمی، علیرضا و فاقعی، داوود (1395)، تحلیل انگیزه‏های‌ گردشگران در انتخاب مقصد، گردشگری کشاورزی؛ مطالعه موردی بخش الموت شرقی، مجله پژوهش‎های روستایی، دوره 4، شماره 7: 422-397.
  6. ورمزیاری، حجت؛ اسدی، علی؛ کلانتری، خلیل و رضوانی، محمدرضا (1393). برآورد میزان تمایل به پرداخت شهروندان برای خدمات گردشگری کشاورزی مطالعة موردی: شهرستان قزوین، فصلنامه پژوهش‎های روستایی، دوره 5، شماره 2: 422-397.
  7. Devesa, M., Laguna, M. and Palacios, A. (2010). The role of motivation in visitor satisfaction: Empirical evidence in rural tourism, Tourism Management, 31(4): 547-552.
  8. Eagles, P.F. and McCool, S.F. (2002). Tourism in National Parks and Protected Areas: Planning and Management, CABI.
  9. Goeldner, C.R. and Ritchie, J.R.B. (2009). Tourism: Principles, Practices, Philosophies: Wiley.
  10. Gorsuch, R.L. (1983). Factor Analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  11. Marques, H. (2006). Searching for complementarities between agriculture and tourism – the demarcated wine-producing regions of northern Portugal, Tourism Economics, 12: 147–155.
  12. McGehee, N.G. and Kim, K. (2004). Motivation for agri-tourism entrepreneurship. Journal of Travel Research, 43(2): 161–170.
  13. McGehee, Nancy G., Kim, Kyungmi, J. and Gayle R. (2007). Gender and motivation for agri-tourism entrepreneurship, Tourism Management, 28: 280–289. 
  14. Ministry of agriculture of people’s republic of china. 2013. 2012 China Agricultural Development Report, China agriculture press, Beijing.
  15. Molera, L. and Albaladejo I. Pilar. 2007. Profiling segments of tourists in rural areas of South-Eastern Spain, Tourism Management, 28: 757–767.
  16. Pesonen, J.A. (2015). Targeting rural tourists in the internet: Comparing travel motivation and activity-based segments, Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 32(3): 211-226.
  17. Rid, W., Ezeuduji, I. O. and Pröbstl-Haider, U. (2014). Segmentation by motivation for rural tourism activities in The Gambia. Tourism Management, 40: 102-116.
  18. Schaneman., A. (Accessed in 2010). Nebraska's Guide to Agri-Tourism & Eco-Tourism Development, The Nebraska Department of Economic Development, Division of travel and tourism, Lincoln, NE.
  19. Sharpley, R. and Vass, A. (2006). Tourism, farming and diversification: An attitudinal study, Tourism Management, 27: 1040–1052.
  20. Sonnino, R. (2004). For a ‘Piece of Bread’? Interpreting sustainable development through agri-tourism in Southern Tuscany, Sociologia Ruralis, 44: 285–300.
  21. Sullins, M., Moxon, D. and Thilmany McFadden, D. (2010). Developing effective marketing strategies for agritourism: Targeting visitor segments, Journal of Agribusiness, 28(2): 111.
  22. Sznajder, M., Przezbórska, L. and Scrimgeour, F. (2009). Agritourism. CABI.
  23. Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and Confirmatory Sactor Analysis: Understanding Concepts and Applications, American Psychological Association.
  24. Weaver, D.B. and Fennell, D.A. (1997). The vacation farm sector in Saskatchewan: A profile of operations, Tourism Management, 18(6): 357–365.