Analysis of Women’s Attitude Towards Women- only Tourism – leisure Spaces Case Study: Women Park of Amol

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant professor of Tourism management, University of Mazandaran

2 Assistant professor of Geography and Urban Planning, University of Mazandaran

Abstract

Introduction
Urban space planning is one of the most important concerns of urban planners, particularly in regard to urban public spaces. The point is that urban public spaces play a key role in providing the citizens with spending leisure time, urban tourism experiences, civic activities and social participation in urban spaces. However, women’s leisure has been influenced by social changes in recent years. Women’s presence in urban areas still encounters unsatisfied expectations, damages to the female’s world and lack of a suitable pattern of leisure and urban recreational spaces. In women’s opinion, public places like parks are still affected by factors such as insecurity, discomfort and lack of a sense of relief for pleasure. This study attempts to investigate women's attitudes towards the phenomenon and finally seeks to find out how women’s views on these spaces are assessed in northern cities of Iran.
 
Materials and methods
Since research methodology of the paper is based on questionnaire, Cochran formula is applied to calculate the sample size so that total population of the region is determined as 385 people. The population is distributed throughout 25 regions, according to population of each region. Likert scale (5-point) is used to prepare the questionnaire. The statistical population is defined through cluster sampling as sort of probability sampling and random selection of individuals within clusters. In this study, 10 items are set for satisfaction index and 8 items are considered for the female’s attitudes towards the women’s park. When questionnaires are distributed, the data are introduced to SPSS for statistical analysis. Both descriptive and inferential statistics are utilized for data analysis; so that the mean, standard deviation and Spearman correlation test are employed for descriptive analysis and ANOVA and Somers’ D method are used for inferential analysis.
 
Discussion and Result
The study aims to find out whether the female’s attitude towards women’s recreational spaces is positive or not in a northern cities of Iran. Various leisure activities are assessed in this regard and relationship between different contextual variables and recreation is also concerned due to their importance in evaluation of these parks from women’s point of view. Research findings demonstrate women’s interest in formation of such parks in the city being studied. Most of them believe that construction of female spaces, like women’s parks, improves sense of security among the female. Although they do not agree with isolating and sexualizing urban spaces generally, construction of such parks are considered appropriate due to freedom of practices, clothing (hijab), sports, etc. Given the relations between contextual variables, the results show a relationship between education, income and jobs and women’s attitude and satisfaction of such leisure facilities.
 
Conclusion
The results show that in Amol, the female population generally considers women’s parks as a choice of leisure activities; they believe that construction of such facilities do not sexualize other urban spaces and women’s parks are a suitable place for urban tourism and leisure activities because of great freedom of practice and the absence of men. Therefore, the first hypothesis is proved. Employed and literate women are more concerned about feminist opinions and separated spaces than unemployed housewives. On the other hand, women’s satisfaction of recreational patterns declines as they get more highly educated; because their expectations of urban spaces are enhanced and employed women have less free time. So the second hypothesis is also proved.
 
Keywords: Park, Women-only Parks, Specialized Parks, Gendered Spaces, Separated Spaces, Urban Spaces.
 
References

Lubuva, J. and Mtani, A. (2004). Urban space and security: A case of the Dar es Salaam, safety audits for women, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, Making Safer Places, Women’s Safety in Our Cities, National Conference, Conference Report, London.
Gillot, G. (2006). Gardens in the Arab World: From Paradise to Dream Parks (Damascus, Cairo and Rabat), available in:  www.cairn.info/revue-annales-de-geographie-2006-4-page-409.htm.
Fontenelle, S. de M. and Zinkhan, G.M. (1993). Gender differences in the perception of leisure: A conceptual model, in NA, Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 20, eds. Leigh McAlister and Michael L. Rothschild, Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 534-540.
Mi-Hye, C. (2006). Gender, leisure and time constraint: Employed men and women’s experience, Development and Society, Vol. 35: 83-105.
Chiesura, A. (2004). The role of urban parks for the sustainable city, Landscape and Urban Planning, 68(1):129–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.08.003
Abazari, Y., Fasayi, S. and Hamidi, N. (2009). Feeling of insecurity in everyday life experience of women, Women Research, 6(1): 75-103.

Keywords


  1. اباذری، یوسف، صادقی فسایی، سهیلا و حمیدی، نفیسه (1387). احساس ناامنی در تجربه زنانه از زندگی روزمره، پژوهش زنان، دورة 6، شماره 1: 103-75.
  2. الهام پور، حسین و پاک سرشت، محمدجعفر (1382). بررسی الگوی گذران اوقات فراغت دانشجویان دانشگاه شهید چمران ، مجله علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، دوره 3، سال 10، شماره­های 3 و 4: 62-39.
  3. بمانیان، محمدرضا، رفیعیان، مجتبی و ضابطیان، الهام (1388). سنجش عوامل موثر بر ارتقای امنیت زنان در محیط های شهری (مورد: محدوده ی اطراف پارک شهر- تهران)، پژوهش زنان، دوره 7، شماره 3: 49-67.
  4. بهنام، جمشید (1348). مقدم­ ای بر جامعه شناسی ایران، انتشارات خوارزمی، تهران.
  5. پور احمد، احمد، سالاروندیان، فاطمه (1391). روند تحولات تاریخی فضاهای گذران اوقات فراغت زنان از قاجاریه تا کنون در شهر تهران ، فصلنامۀ زن در توسعه و سیاست، شماره 3: 74-51.
  6. تندنویس، فریدون (1391). جایگاه ورزش دراوقات فراغت زنان ایرانی، مجله حرکت، شماره 12: 87-104.
  7. دومازدیه، ژوفر (1352). زمان فراغت از دیدگاه تاریخی و جامعه شناسانه؛ ترجمه م. آدینه، مجله فرهنگ و زندگی ،شماره 12: 16-6.
  8. رفعت جاه، مریم (1386).  قدرت ، جنسیت و فراغت، سمینار معماری کلان اوقات فراغت در تهران، دانشگاه تهران، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی، اردیبهشت 86.
  9. زاهدی، اصل (1370) جامعه شناسی فراغت، دفتر همکاری حوزه و دانشگاه.
  10. ساروخانی، باقر(1370). فرهنگ علوم اجتماعی، تهران: انتشارات کیهان .
  11. شاطریان، محسن و اشنویی، امیر (1390). تحلیل فضایی نحوه و میزان گذران اوقات فراغت : نمونه موردی بافت قدیم و جدید شهر کاشان، مجله مطالعات فرهنگی و ارتباطات، شماره 1: 166-142.
  12. فکوهی، ناصر و انصاری مهابادی، فرشته  (1382)، اوقات فراغت و شکل گیری شخصیت فرهنگی- نمونه موردی دو دبیرستان دخترانه ی شهر تهران، نامه ی انسان شناسی، دوره 1، شماره 4، 82:  89-61.
  13. کی منش، خسرو (1378). شناخت اوقات فراغت و راههای پرکردن آن،قم : انتشارات دارالثقلین.
  14. نیک پور،صغری، حاجی کاظمی، افتخارالسادات و حقانی، حمید  (1384). بررسی نوع و مدت فعالیتهای فیزیکی زنان شاغل در حیطه های شغلی و اوقات فراغت در سال 1382 ، مجله دانشگاه علوم پزشکی ایران، شماره 46: 381-392.
  15. هیوود، لس ؛کیو، فرانسیس؛ براهام، پیتر؛ اسپینک، جان؛ کاپنرهارست، جان و هنری، جان (1380) . اوقات فراغت، ترجمه محمد احسانی، نشر امید دانش.
  16. فرهودی، رحمت الله؛ حبیبی، لیلا؛ حاتمی نژاد، حسین؛ جعفری مهرآبادی، مریم و سالاروندیان، فاطمه(1390). فضاهای ویژه و مشارکت زنان در فعالیت های فراغتی، فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت گردشگری، شماره 15: 85-110.
  17. Lubuva, J. and Mtani, A. (2004). Urban space and security: A case of the Dar es Salaam, safety audits for women, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania,. Making Safer Places, Women’s Safety in our Citis, National Conference, Conference Report, London, 18th November 2005.
  18. Gillot, G. (2006).Gardens in the Arab World: From Paradise to Dream Parks (Damascus, Cairo and Rabat).available in:  www.cairn.info/revue-annales-de-geographie-2006-4-page-409.htm
  19. Fontenelle, S. de M. and Zinkhan, G. M. (1993).Gender Differences in the Perception of Leisure: a Conceptual Model, in NA - Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 20, eds. Leigh McAlister and Michael L. Rothschild, Provo, UT : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 534-540.
  20. Mi-Hye, C. (2006). Gender, leisure and time constraint: employed men and women’s experience, Development and society, Vol. 35: 83-105.
  21. Chiesura, A. (2004). The role of urban parks for the sustainable city, Landscape and Urban Planning, 68(1): 129–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.08.003.