An Assessment of Spatial Appropriateness for Ecotourism Development in the Region of Rudbar Ghasran and Lavasanat, Using OWA Criteria with Fuzzy Quantizers

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Associate Professor of Earth Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University

2 Professor at the Center for Remote Sensing Studies and GIS, Shahid Beheshti University

3 Associate Professor of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shahid Beheshti University

4 Ph.D. student of Geography and Urban Planning, Shahid Beheshti University

Abstract

Extended Abstract
Introduction
Over the past few decades, ecotourism as one of the subcategories of the tourism industry has had a remarkable growth. It is evident from a responsible trip to a natural surrounding leading to the preservation of environment and the sustainable welfare of the locals. Developed and developing countries promote it as a strong tool for the growth and sustainable development. Iran can be the center of tourist attractions due to its particular geographical setting and having natural features in all four seasons. The development of this industry needs an exact identification of capabilities and infrastructure in each region. One of the fundamental stages of this process is the location of tourist-ready zones, especially ecotourism by applying modern technology. The selection of correct place not only saves time, expenses and resources but provides the maximum investment efficiency. As such, the expansion of ecotourism activities and the selection of ready zones necessitate more studies. Iran’s Rudbar, Ghasran and Lavasanat region, surrounded by the Alborz mountain range, is a beautiful landscape with a pleasant climate. Abundant natural attractions of the region, equally with suitable tourism infrastructure as well as using existing capabilities, can help achieve the sustainable development of the tourism industry.
 
 
Materials and methods
 In the current research, in order to identify the ecotourism potential of the region and present suitable ways, first effective criteria and indices were identified and extracted for developing ecotourism and then a multi-criteria evaluation AHP method was used to distinguish the importance of each of the effective parameters. Thereafter, data such as visibility, height, slope, distance from roads, landuse, distance to natural attractions, fault line, distance to educational centers and religious attractions as well as archeological sites were applied. Finally, the OWA method in GIS was used to identify a suitable region and combine layers based on various scenarios.
 
Discussion and Result
Through this method, seven scenarios including extreme pessimistic, very pessimistic, pessimistic, optimistic, very optimistic, extreme optimistic and natural were studied in relation to the potential to develop ecotourism. The acquired results are based on the normalized data with the interval of 0 to 1 as classified below: Very Low Proportion  Low Proportion High Proportion Suitable Proportion  0-0.25   0.25-0.5   0.5-0.75   0.75-1 The results acquired from the above data through the OWA method will be presented later. The extreme pessimistic scenario was observed in 1022.8 sq. km of the proposed region with low proportion and 74.4 sq. km area with very low proportion. In the pessimistic scenario, a large part of Greater Lavasanat had very low proportion while another large part with low proportion. Based on extreme optimistic scenario, 1090.5 sq. km of the area were the most suitable and 6.75 sq. km with high proportion. In this scenario, the central core of Rudbar Ghasran and Lavasanat is located on a very suitable flank where conditions do not coincide with spatial and environmental realities. Based on natural scenario, 741.8 sq. km of the proposed study were related to an area with high proportion and 355.4 sq. km with low proportion. The central core, due to the location of two urban points of Lavasan and Feshm as well as their service and social facilities allocate the most area with high proportion. 
 
Conclusion
Results from various scenarios indicate high proportion of the region for ecotourism development. The use of the OWA method gives managers and planners possibilities to study different scenarios in one region. The proposed model and the acquired results can be used by managers and planners as a decision-making backup structure in this domain and the extraction of suitable strategy toward ecotourism development.
 
Keywords: sustainable ecotourism; multi-criteria evaluation; AHP; GIS; OWA.  
 
 
 
References

Alaeddinoglu, F., & Can, A. S. (2011). Identification and classification of nature-based tourismresources: Western Lake Van basin, Turkey, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,          19 (2011): 198-207.
Bali, A., Monavari, S., Riazi, B., Khorasani, N., ZARKESH, M., & KHEIRKHAH, M. (2015). A spatial decision support system for ecotourism development in Caspian Hyrcanian mixed forests ecoregion. Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas, 21(2): 340-353.
Chen, J., & Zhu, Q. (2010). Uncertainty and decision strategy analysis of GIS-based ordered weighted averaging method. Paper presented at 2010 International Conference on Information, Networking and Automation (ICINA),  Kunming, China 18-19 Oct. 2010.
Dashti, S., Monavari, S. M., Hosseini, S. M., Riazi, B., & Momeni, M. (2013). Application of GIS, AHP, Fuzzy and WLC in island ecotourism development (Case study of Qeshm Island, Iran), Life Science Journal, 10(1): 1274-1282.
Delavar, B., Oladi, J., & Manoochehri, M. (2010). Evaluating the Ecotourism Potentials of Naharkhoran Area in Gorgan. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Science, 38(8): 591-596.
Dhami, I., Deng, J., Burns, R. C., & Pierskalla, C. (2014). Identifying and mapping forest-based ecotourism areas in West Virginia–Incorporating visitors' preferences, Tourism Management, 42(2014):  165-176.

 

Keywords


  1. Ahmadi, M., Asgari, S., & Ghanavati, E. (2015). Land capability evaluation for ecotourism development in Ilam province, a GIS approach, Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas, 21(1): 107-125.
  2. Alaeddinoglu, F., & Can, A. S. (2011). Identification and classification of nature-based tourism resources: Western Lake Van basin, Turkey, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 19(2011): 198-207.
  3. Asproth, V., Holmberg, S., & Håkansson, A. (1999). Decision support for spatial planning and management of human settlements, Advances in support systems research Vol V: Decision support methodology for human systems management and its applications in economics and commerce.
  4. Bali, A., Monavari, S., Riazi, B., Khorasani, N., Zarkesh, M., & Kheirkhah, M. (2015). A spatial decision support system for ecotourism development in Caspian Hyrcanian mixed forests ecoregion,  Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas, 21(2): 340-353.
  5. Begley, S. (1996). Beware of the humans (eco-tourism is hurting ecosystems), Newsweek.

15. Bunruamkaew, K., & Murayam, Y. (2011). Site suitability evaluation for ecotourism using GIS & AHP: A case study of Surat Thani province, Thailand,  Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 21(2011):  269-278

  1. Cobbinah, P. B. (2015). Contextualising the meaning of ecotourism, Tourism Management Perspectives, 16(2015):  179-189.      
  2. Chen, J., & Zhu, Q. (2010). Uncertainty and decision strategy analysis of GIS-based ordered weighted averaging method. Paper presented at 2010 International Conference on Information, Networking and Automation (ICINA),  Kunming, China 18-19 Oct. 2010
  3. Dashti, S., Monavari, S. M., Hosseini, S. M., Riazi, B., & Momeni, M. (2013). Application of GIS, AHP, Fuzzy and WLC in island ecotourism development (Case study of Qeshm Island, Iran), Life Science Journal, 10(1): 1274-1282.
  4. Delavar, B., Oladi, J., & Manoochehri, M. (2010). Evaluating the Ecotourism Potentials of Naharkhoran Area in Gorgan. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Science, 38(8): 591-596.
  5. Dhami, I., Deng, J., Burns, R. C., & Pierskalla, C. (2014). Identifying and mapping forest-based ecotourism areas in West Virginia–Incorporating visitors' preferences. Tourism Management, 42(2014): 165-176.
  6. Feizizadeh, B., Blaschke, T., & Nazmfar, H. (2014). GIS-based ordered weighted averaging and Dempster–Shafer methods for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Urmia Lake Basin, Iran, International Journal of Digital Earth, 7(8): 688-708.
  7. Gigović, L., Pamučar, D., Lukić, D., & Marković, S. (2016). GIS-Fuzzy DEMATEL MCDA model for the evaluation of the sites for ecotourism development: A case study of “Dunavski ključ” region, Serbia, Land Use Policy, 58(2016):  348-365.
  8. Goodwin, H. (1996). In pursuit of ecotourism, Biodiversity & Conservation, 5(3): 277-291.
  9. Jiang, H., & Eastman, J. R. (2000). Application of fuzzy measures in multi-criteria evaluation in GIS, International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 14(2): 173-184.
  10. Jones, S. (2005). Community-based ecotourism: The significance of social capital, Annals of Tourism Research, 32(2): 303-324.
  11. Makropoulos, C., & Butler, D. (2006). Spatial ordered weighted averaging: incorporating spatially variable attitude towards risk in spatial multi-criteria decision-making, Environmental Modelling & Software, 21(1): 69-84.
  12. Makropoulos, C., Butler, D., & Maksimovic, C. (2003). Fuzzy logic spatial decision support system for urban water management, Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 129(1): 69-77.
  13. Malczewski, J. (2006). Ordered weighted averaging with fuzzy quantifiers: GIS-based multicriteria evaluation for land-use suitability analysis, International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 8(4): 270-277.
  14. Malczewski, J., Chapman, T., Flegel, C., Walters, D., Shrubsole, D., & Healy, M. A. (2003). GIS–multicriteria evaluation with ordered weighted averaging (OWA): case study of developing watershed management strategies. Environment and Planning, 35(10): 1769-1784.
  15. Malczewski, J., & Rinner, C. (2005). Exploring multicriteria decision strategies in GIS with linguistic quantifiers: A case study of residential quality evaluation, Journal of Geographical Systems, 7(2): 249-268.
  16. Mendes, J. F., & Motizuki, W. S. (2001). Urban quality of life evaluation scenarios: The case of Sao Carlos in Brazil, CTBUH review, 1(2): 13-23.
  17. Mobaraki, O., Abdollahzadeh, M., & Kamelifar, Z. (2014). Site suitability evaluation for ecotourism using GIS and AHP: a case study of Isfahan Townships, Iran. Management Science Letters, 4(8): 1893-1898.
  18. Mohd, Z. H., & Ujang, U. (2016). Integrating Multiple Criteria Evaluation and Gis  in Ecotourism: A Review, International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing & Spatial Information Sciences, Volume XLII-4/W1 (2016): 351-354
  19. Mokarram, M., & Aminzadeh, F. (2010). GIS-based multicriteria land suitability evaluation using ordered weight averaging with fuzzy quantifier: a case study in Shavur Plain, Ira, The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 38(2): 508-512.
  20. Mokarram, M., & Hojati, M. (2017). Using ordered weight averaging (OWA) aggregation for multi-criteria soil fertility evaluation by GIS (case study: southeast Iran). Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 132(2017): 1-13.
  21. Nadi, S., & Delavar, M. R. (2011). Multi-criteria, personalized route planning using quantifier-guided ordered weighted averaging operators, International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoformation, 13(3): 322-335.
  22. Nino, K., Mamo, Y., Mengesha, G., & Kibret, K. S. (2017). GIS based ecotourism potential assessment in Munessa Shashemene Concession Forest and its surrounding area, Ethiopia, Applied Geography, 82(2017): 48-58
  23. Ohadi, S., Dorbeiki, M., & Bahmanpour, H. (2013). Ecotourism zoning in protected areas using GIS, Advances in Environmental Biology, 7(4): 677-684.
  24. Pareta, K. (2013). Remote sensing and GIS based site suitability analysis for tourism development, International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Applied Sciences, 2(5): 43-58
  25. Samanta, S., & Baitalik, A. (2015). Potential Site Selection for Eco-Tourism: A Case Study of Four Blocks in Bankura District Using Remote Sensing and GIS Technology, West Bengal, International Journal of Advanced Research (IJAR), 3(4): 978-989
  26. Valente, R. d. O. A., & Vettorazzi, C. A. (2008). Definition of priority areas for forest conservation through the ordered weighted averaging method, Forest Ecology and Management, 256(6): 1408-1417.
  27. Vettorazzi, C. A., & Valente, R. A. (2016). Priority areas for forest restoration aiming at the conservation of water resources, Ecological Engineering, 94(2016):  255-267.
  28. Yager, R. R. (1988). On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decisionmaking,  IEEE Transactions on systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 18(1): 183-190.
  29. Yager, R. R. (1996). Quantifier guided aggregation using OWA operators. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 11(1): 49-73.
  30. Zarkesh, M. M. K., Almasi, N., & Taghizadeh, F. (2011). Ecotourism land capability evaluation using spatial multi criteria evaluation, Res J Appl Sci Eng Technol, 3(7): 693-700.