Illustrating the Scientific Co- Authorship Network in Geotourism Research

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

-----

Abstract

Abstract
Geotourism is one of the new concepts that has attracted the attention of the academics. The growing of published articles in this field has made it necessary to have a holistic review of geotourism studies. The findings of this research are expected to help identifying research gaps in this field and pave the way for future research. The purpose of this study is to illustrate the situation in geotourism studies via describing and analyzing English articles published in geotourism field. Achieving the purpose, scientometrics and social network analysis methods are applied. After searching related words in title, abstract and keywords of articles, data were analyzed using Density and Clustering Coefficient and Centrality indexes in VOSviewer, UCINET, NETDRAW software. Based on results the US, UK, Australia, Italy and Germany have a key role in the research network of this field. In addition to introducing authors who have a relatively high degree of centrality, it was found that most of these articles focused on topics such as conservation, evolution, management, diversity, ecotourism. Both Co- authorship and Co-occurrence of the articles published by Iranian researchers in English were also evaluated in this study.



Key Words: Geotourism, Scientometrics, Scientific Co- Authorship Network, .

Keywords


 
Borgatti, S.P. & Everett, M.G. (2006), A Graph-theoretic perspective on centrality, Social Networks, NO.28. pp. 466–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2005.11.005.
Chen, C. (2006). CiteSpace II: Detecting and Visualizing Emerging Trends, 57(3), 359–377. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi
Dowling, R. K. (2013). Global Geotourism – An Emerging Form of Sustainable Tourism, Czech journal of tourism, 2(October), 59–79. https://doi.org/10.2478/cjot-2013-0004
Erfanmanesh, M. & Hosseini, E. (2015), Cross-time Analysis of Countries Co-Authorship Networks in Library & Information Science Research, University of Nebraska – Lincoln, Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). 1316.
Fang, Y., Yin, J., & Wu, B. (2017). Climate change and tourism: a scientometric analysis using CiteSpace, 9582(May). https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2017.1329310
Guns, R., Xian, Y., & Dilruba, L. (2011). Q-measures and betweenness centrality in a collaboration network: a case study of the field of informetrics, 133–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0332-3
Hanneman, R. & Riddle, M. (2005), Introduction to social network analysis. Riverside CA: University of California. Published in digital form at http://faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/
He, Q. (1999), Knowledge Discovery through Co-Word Analysis, Library Trends, 48 (1), 133-159. https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/bistrea
Hose, T. A. (2011), The English Origins of Geo tourism (as a Vehicle for Geo conservation) and Their Relevance to Current Studies, Acta geographica Slovenica, NO. 51 (2), p.p. 343–360. https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS51302
Jiang, Y., Ritchie, B. W., Benckendorff, P., Jiang, Y., Ritchie, B. W., & Bibliometric, P. B. (2017). Current Issues in Tourism Bibliometric visualisation: an application in tourism crisis and disaster management research. Current Issues in Tourism0(0), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2017.1408574
Liu, H. & Liu, Y. & Wang, Y. (2018), Hot topics and emerging trends in tourism forecasting research: A scientometric review, Tourism Economics p.p.1–21, https://doi.org/10.1177/1354816618810564
Migoń, P. & Pijet-Migoń, E. (2017), Interpreting Geoheritage at New Zealand’s Geothermal Tourist Sites—Systematic Explanation Versus Storytelling, Geoheritage, NO. 9, pp. 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-016-0185-0
Newsome, D. & Dowling, R. k. & leung, Y. F. (2012), The nature and management of geotourism: A case study of two established iconic geotourism destinations. Tourism Management Perspectives, 2-3, 19-27.
Olafsdottir, R. & Dowling, R. (2014), Geotourism and Geoparks—A Tool for Geoconservation and Rural Development in Vulnerable Environments: A Case Study from Iceland, Geoheritage, NO.6, p.p.71–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-013-0095-3
Olafsdottir, R. & Tverijonaite, E. (2018), Geotourism: A Systematic Literature Review, geosciences, 8, 234. https://doi.org10.3390/geosciences8070234 
Otte, E. & Rousseau, R. (2002), Social network analysis: A powerful strategy, also for the information sciences, Journal of Information Science, 28(6), 441- 453. http://doi.org/10.1177/016555150202800601
Qian, J. & Law, R. & Wei, J. (2018), Knowledge mapping in travel website studies: a scientometric review, Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, https://doi.org/10.1080/15022250.2018.1526113
Rannveig, Ó., & Tverijonaite, E. (2018). Geotourism: A Systematic Literature Review. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8070234
Scott, J. & Carrington, P.J. (2011), The SAGE handbook of social network analysis. London, U.K.: SAGE publications.
Soheili, F. & Osareh, F. (2014), A survey on density and size of co-authorship networks in information science journals, Iranian Journal of Information Processing Management, 29 (2), 351- 372. Retrieved from http://jipm.irandoc.ac.ir/
 Truex, D. (n.d.). Journal of the Association for Information Systems Assessing Scholarly Influence: Using the Hirsch Indices to Reframe the Discourse Assessing Scholarly Influence: Using the Hirsch Indices to Reframe the Discourse, 10(7), 560–594.
Vahed, N. & Zarea Gavgani, V. & Jafarzadeh, Tusi, Z. & Erfanmanesh, M. (2018), Visualization of the Scholarly Output on Evidence Based Librarianship: A Social Network Analysis, Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, NO. 13. Pp. 50-69. https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip29396
Yu, L., Wang, G., & Marcouiller, D. W. (2019). A scientometric review of pro-poor tourism research: Visualization and analysis Criteria / Method. Tourism Management Perspectives30(February), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2019.02.005
Zhang, S., Lyu, P., & Yan, Y. (2015). Global geographical and scientometric analysis of tourism-themed research. Scientometrics, NO. 105(1), p.p. 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1678-3