The analysis of the causal relationship of social capital and sustainable development of tourism (Case study: Sari city)

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D. Student of Sociology of Social Issues of Iran, Kashan University

2 Assistant Professor of Social Sciences Department

Abstract

Abstract
The goal of present study is to investigate the causal relationship between social capital and sustainable development of tourism. To achieve the goal of this research, survey method was used in this study. The study population consisted of citizens in Sari. The sample size software was used to determine pass through a sample size of 640 people is estimated. In this study, a multi-stage stratified cluster sampling was used, and questionnaire was used for data collection. Research findings have shown that variable social trust and network variables, respectively, the highest (0/383) and lowest (0/156) the effect on the dependent variable (sustainable development of tourism). The results also show the positive effects of social capital (networks of relationships, social participation, social trust) on the sustainable development of tourism, which means that the increase of social capital, the average increase sustainable tourism development.
 
Introduction
One of the basics of sustainable development is a good performance and cooperation from the host community. Experience also shows that without cooperation and support of the local community sustainable tourism industry cannot be created (Choi and Jamal, 2009). One of the factors that plays an important role in achieving sustainable development is the social wealth among the public which is used today along with human, financial and economical wealth. This concept is concerned with bonds and relationships between members of a social network which achieves its aims though creation of norms and mutual confidence (Alvani and Seyed Naghavi, 1381).
In the current study it was attempted to investigate the relationship between social capital and sustainable development of tourism.
 
Materials and Methods
The methods research method is survey. The statistical population in this study is the citizens of 18 years and older of Sari city. In the present study, a pass software was used to determine the sample size. Confidence quotient in the study was set at 0.999 and error quotient is 0.001. Therefore, based on 0.999 confidence quotient and considering the least standard deviation and error of standard deviation, the size of the population was calculated to be 640. In this research, a multistage cluster sampling method proportional to volume has been used.
 
Discussion and Results
Descriptive finding of the study show that the mean of social capital among the whole population under study was 4.74 out of 10 and the mean of sustainable development of tourism was 4.58 out of 10. Referential findings also show that social capital along with the relationship network, social confidence, and social collaboration has significant effects on sustainable development of tourism. It was also found that social capital (the relations network, social cooperation and social confidence) has a positive impact on sustainable development of tourism meaning that with the increase in social capital the mean of sustainable development of tourism the local community improves positively.
 
Conclusions
In development, social wealth is composed of three characteristics: confidence, mutual relationships, and cooperation. If these elements are strong in societies, the settlers in these societies have more opportunities in building the economy and society. Development might impact the relationships between the settlers with each other and with the host society. A considerable part of the literature in social development of tourism indicates that in the first stage of planning for tourism development the role of the society and benefiters must be defined. The importance of social wealth is that mutual confidence increases cooperation by reducing the costs of dealing as people are not forced to pay for controlling others' behavior and instead create confidence for group operations.
 
Keywords: sustainable tourism development, social capital, Social participation, network of relationships. trust, Sari.
 
References

Bourdieu, P. (1985). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, Richard Nice (Tran) ,Rootled& Keagan Paul.
Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and Revival of American community. New York, N.Y.: Simon & Schuster.
Putnam, R. D. (1999). The Prosperous Community: Social Capital and Public Life, the American Prospect, Inc.

Rattanasuwongchai, N. (1998). Rural tourism—the impact on rural communities, Bangkok: Thailand: Kasetsart University, Department of Career Sciences.
Sawatsky, T. (2008). the influence of social capital on the development of nature tourism, Research Project, University of Toronto.

Keywords


  1.  

    1. Asian Productivity Organization. (2006). Potential of social capital for community development, Japan
    2. Bourdieu, P. (1985). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, Richard Nice (Tran),Rootled& Keagan Paul.
    3. Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1997). The Inheritors: French Students and their Relations to Culture, Chicago. University of Chicago Press.
    4. Choi, H. C., & Sirakaya, E. (2006). Sustainability indicators for managing community tourism, International Journal of tourism management, 27(6): 1247-1289.
    5. Choo. H,  & Jamal, T. (2009). Tourism on organic farms in South Korea: a new form of ecotourism, Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 17(4): 431-454.
    6. Connelly, J. & Smith, G. (1999). Politics & the Environment, from theory to practice, Routledge, London and Newyork
    7. Houwelingen,  P. V. (2012). Neighborhood Associations and Social Capital in Japan, Urban Affairs Review, 48(4): 467-497.
    8. Macbeth, J., Carson, D., &  Northolt, J. (2004). Social Capital, Tourism & Regional Development: SPSS as a basic for Innovation and Sustainability, Current Issue in Tourism Journal, 7(6): 502-522.
    9. Paige, P.V., Christine, A., Vogt, Annette, M., & Rummel, J. (2015). Social network participation and coverage by tourism industry sector, Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 4:110–119.
    10. Park, D., Lee, K., Choi, H., & Yoon, Y. (2012). Factors influencing Social Capital in rural tourism communities in South Korea, Tourism Management Journal, 33(2012): 1511-1520.
    11. Putnam, R.D. (1993). The Prosperes Community Social Capital and Public life, The American Prospect, No 13: 36-42
    12. Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
    13. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and Revival of American community. New York, N.Y.: Simon & Schuster.
    14. Putnam, R. D. (1999). The Prosperous Community: Social Capital and Public Life, the American Prospect, Inc.
    15. Rattanasuwongchai, N. (1998). Rural tourism—The impact on rural communities, Bangkok: Thailand: Kasetsart University, Department of Career Sciences.
    16. Sawatsky, T. (2008). The influence of social capital on the development of nature tourism, Research Project, University of Toronto.
    17. Warner, F. (1999). Social capital construction and the role of the local state, Rural Sociology, 64(3): 120-159.
    18. Zhao, W. (2011). Social Capital and Tourism Entrepreneurship, Annals of tourism Research Journal, 38(4): 1570-1593.