sociological study of the phenomenon of pseudo-tourist" in the Oramanat area of Kurdistan Province

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Professor of university

Abstract

Tourism is a complex system in which different stakeholders have different views about it. The main goal of this research is study of the view and perception of the host community towards tourists. the method is phenomenology and data is collected from a deep interview with 27 people. Our population is Oromanat Tourist Area of Kurdistan Province. The findings show that the people of Oramanat as the host do not have the same look at tourists. In their view, there is a fundamental difference between tourists from different regions that traveling to Oromanat. In general, In their view, there are six categories of tourists: Foreign, domestic and regional (non-Kurdistan), domestic (Kurdistan), non-regional tourists from away parts of Iran, and groups of friends and schools. From the perspective of the people of the region, each of these groups is significantly different from the others, on the base of main economic, social, cultural and environmental domains. According to the view of the host society, most tourists who travel to this area can be described most often in the form of the "pseudo-tourist" and "false tourism" concept. Because it has very little economic benefit and negative socio-cultural and environmental impacts for the area.

Keywords


Andereck, K. L., Valentine, K. M., Knopf, R. C., & Vogt, C. A. (2005). Residents' perceptions of community tourism impacts. Annals of Tourism Research, 32(4), 1056–1076.
Adler, J, 1989a: Travel as a performed art. American Journal of Sociology 96: 1366–91.
Boorstin, D. 1964: The Image: A Guide to Pseudo Events in America. New York: Atheneum.
Byrd, E. T., Bosley, H. E., & Dronberger, M. G. (2009). Comparisons of stakeholder perceptions of tourism impacts in rural eastern North Carolina. Tourism Management, 30(5), 693–703.
Cohen, E. (1982a). Jungle guides in northern Thailand: The dynamics of a marginal occupational role. Sociol. Rev. 30(2):234-66.
Cohen, Erik (1988), TRADITIONS IN THE QUALITATIVE SOCIOLOGY OF TOURISM Annalro/7%rm Remmh, Vol. 15, pp. 29-46.
Cohen, Erik (1984), The Sociology of Tourism: Approaches, Issues, and Findings, Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 10. (1984), pp. 373-392.
Costa, Nicolo and Martinotti, Guido (2003), Sociological Theories of Tourism and Regulation Theory, in CITIES AND VISITORS (2003), Edited by Lily M. Hoffman, Susan S. Fainstein, and Dennis R. Judd. First edition, Blackwell Publishing.
Leiper. N. (1979). The framework of tourism: Towards a definition of tourism, tourist and the tourist industry. Antz. Tourism Res. 6(4):39&407.
Pearce. P. L. 1982. The Social Psychology of Tourist Behaviour. New York: Pergamon.
Pi-Sunyer, (1977). Through native eyes: Tourists and tourism in a Catalan maritime community. See Smith 1977c, pp. 149-55.
Polkinghorne D. (1983). Methodology for the human sciences: Systems of inquiry. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Seaton, A.V. & Bennett, M.M., (1996). Marketing Tourism Products, International Thomson Business Press, 1st ed.
Smith. V . L. (1977a). Eskimo tourism: Micromodels and marginal man. See Smith 1977c, pp. 51-70.
Stott, M. A. (1978). Tourism in Mykonos: Some social and cultural responses. Medirerr. Srcid. 1 (2):72-90.
Sutton, W. A. )1967). Travel andunderstanding: Notes on the social structure of touring. Inr. J. Comp. Sociol. 8(2):218-23.
 Turner, L. and Ash, J. (1975). The Golden Hordes: International Tourism and the Pleasure Periphery. London: Constable.
Valle R, King M, Haling S. (1989) An introduction to existential phenomenological thought in psychology. In R. Valle & S.
van den Berghe, P. (1980). Tourism as ethnic relations: A case study of Cuzco, Peru. Erhn. Racial Srcid. 3(4):375-92.
van Manen M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy New York, State University of New York Press;1990,9.